This time it’s real.
Several high-profile Twitter users are losing the blue checks that help verify their identities and separate them from pretenders on the Elon Musk-owned social media platform.
After several false starts, Twitter on Thursday started making good on its promise to remove blue checks from accounts that don’t pay a monthly fee to keep them. Twitter had about 300,000 verified users under its original blue-check system – many of them journalists, athletes and public figures. The checks — which meant the account was verified by Twitter based on who it says — began disappearing from these users’ profiles late in the morning Pacific Time.
Read more: Twitter is collapsing, and nothing can change it
The cost of marking ranges from $8 per month for individual web users to a starting price of $1,000 per month to verify an organization, plus $50 per month for each affiliate or employee account. Twitter does not verify individual accounts, as was the case with previous BlueChecks during the pre-Musk administration of the platform.
Celebrity users, from basketball star LeBron James to author Stephen King and Star Trek’s William Shatner, shied away from joining — though on Thursday, all three had blue checks indicating the account paid for verification. Is.
King, for one, said he hasn’t paid.
“My Twitter account says I subscribed to Twitter Blue. I didn’t. My Twitter account says I subscribed to Twitter Blue. I didn’t,” King Tweeted Thursday. “just so you know.”
one in answer Musk replied to King’s tweet, saying “You’re welcome Namaste” and in one more tweet He added that he is “paying for something personally.” that later Tweeted He was just paying for King, Shatner and James.
singer dion warwick Tweeted earlier in the week that the site’s verification system is “a complete mess.”
“The way Twitter is going, I could be anybody now,” Warwick said. He previously vowed not to pay for Twitter Blue, Saying The monthly fee can “(and will) go towards my extra hot latte.”
On Thursday, Warwick lost his blue check (which is actually a white check mark on a blue background).
For users who still had their Blue check on Thursday, a popup message indicated that the account “is verified because they’ve subscribed to Twitter Blue and verified their phone number.” Verifying a phone number simply means that the person has a phone number and has verified that they have access to it — it does not verify the person’s identity.
Read more: Facebook and Twitter are charging for the extra security. here’s what that means for you
It wasn’t just celebrities and journalists who lost blue checks on Thursday. Many government agencies, nonprofits, and public-service accounts around the world found themselves not verified, raising concerns that Twitter is losing ground as a platform for receiving accurate, up-to-date information from authentic sources, including in emergencies. You may lose your position.
While Twitter offers gold checks for “verified organizations” and gray checks for government organizations and their affiliates, it is unclear how the platform does these and they were not found on several previously verified agency and public service accounts Thursday. They went.
The official Twitter account for the Government of the City of New York, formerly Blue Check, Tweeted on Thursday that “This is an authentic Twitter account representing the New York City government. This is the only account for @NYCGov operated by the New York City government in an effort to clear up the confusion.”
A newly created spoof account with 36 followers (also without the blue check) disagrees: “No, you’re not. This account is the only authentic Twitter account operating and representing the City of New York City.”
Soon, another spoof account — claiming to be Pope Francis — also weighed in: “Pope Francis, by the authority vested in me, I declare @NYC_GOVERNMENT the official government of New York City. With you in peace Stay.”
Fewer than 5% of legacy verified accounts have paid to join Twitter Blue, according to an analysis by Travis Browne, a Berlin-based developer of software for tracking social media.
Musk’s move has upset some high-profile users and pleased some right-wing figures and Musk fans who thought the points were unfair. But it hasn’t been an obvious money maker for the social media platform that has long relied on advertising for most of its revenue.
Read more: Elon Musk’s Twitter Plans Show He Haven’t Considered What He’s Got Yet
Digital intelligence platform SimilarWeb analyzed how many people signed up for Twitter Blue on their desktop computers and found just 116,000 confirmed sign-ups last month, which doesn’t represent a major revenue stream of $8 or $11 a month. does. Accounts purchased through mobile apps were not counted in the analysis.
After buying San Francisco-based Twitter in October for $44 billion, Musk has been trying to boost the struggling platform’s revenue by getting more people to pay for premium subscriptions. But his move also reflects his claim that the blue verification mark has become an ineligible or “corrupt” status symbol for celebrities, news reporters and others who were given free verification by Twitter’s previous leadership.
Twitter started tagging profiles with a blue check mark about 14 years ago. One of the main reasons was to provide an additional tool to prevent misinformation coming from accounts impersonating people, along with protecting celebrities from impersonators. Most “legacy blue checks”, which include accounts of politicians, activists and people who suddenly find themselves in the news, as well as little-known journalists in small publications around the world, are not household names.
One of Musk’s first products after taking over Twitter was to launch a service that provided blue checks to anyone willing to pay $8 a month. But it was quickly flooded with impostor accounts, including those impersonating Nintendo, pharmaceutical company Eli Lilly and Musk’s businesses Tesla and SpaceX, so Twitter had to temporarily suspend the service a few days after its launch.
The relaunched service costs $8 per month for web users and $11 per month for users of its iPhone or Android apps. Members are expected to see fewer ads, post longer videos, and have their Tweets featured more prominently.
—AP Technology Writer Matt O’Brien contributed to this report.
Must read more from time to time
Contact at [email protected].